geisha face makeup

images She paints her face to hide

Geisha Makeup How To

pra945

12-09 11:56 PM

i got 221(g) on DEC 1st 2009

---

wallpaper Geisha Makeup How To

The Geisha#39;s make up,

genscn

01-29 12:22 PM

Is there something wrong with Indian Consulate-Houston's website? http://www.cgihouston.org/

Are they close for some reason?

---

MrS - Geisha amp; Maiko make-up

chanduv23

05-28 03:51 PM

Heard this from our company lawyer .... uscis will issue RFE for all I-485 applications that are pending for a while to make sure the applicant still has the job offer. He got this from a very reliable source. I dont know how true it is...just sharing what I have heard.

RFE for employment verification seems to be common these days. As long as you are eligible to port jobs under AC21 - there is no need to worry if you used AC21.

---

2011 The Geisha#39;s make up,

Everyone bow down to Geisha

HKK

12-13 12:59 AM

I am going to new Delhi for h1b stamping in few days. While preparing my file for h1b stamping, I figured that my attorney has mentioned wrong SSN on for I-129. Past 4 numbers of SSN mentioned is last four digits of my phone number which is not right. Would it adversely affect my h1b stamping? What should I do? I am going to india after 4 years and I noticed this mistake at last moment. Somebody please help....!!!


I work in an immigration law office, so I know the general procedure.

Suggestion: First, inform your attorney of your intent to disclose this mistake with a state Bar and wait how he deals with it. Do not be afraid. This is due process and you have right to do it. Keep all mail receipts for records and copies of all and ANY correspondence with the attorney. Wait how he responds. Normally, your attorney should admit the mistake and straight things up with USCIS on himself.This is because an attorney can loose a license to practice in his state if he does not fix this after you file a complaint with state BAR. If you receive no feedback, you should inform a state BAR about this to protect your self. Then, go to a different attorney's office and try to work with a new attorney to straight things out. This is serious. Contact me via PM if you need more info. thanx.

Remember: USCIS keeps a copy of each thing you send. So, sooner or later this important mistake may surface and cause you trouble. That's why you need to fix this out.

---

more...

The face is the only thing I

Dhundhun

10-15 01:49 PM

Is the U.S. Losing Its Edge in Tech?



In one word answer seems to be "yes". Few indicators are:

- With CERN Large Hadron Collider, Europe took a quantum leap into physics
- With Airbus A380, Europe taking lead in passenger aircraft. It is technically superior as only two flying crew member perform role of flight engineer and navigator. We can not forget supersonic Concorde.
- In cloning several other countries are ahead
- US does not have technology/infrastructure to make chepeast car in the world.
- Due to business model, usually cellular devices/services are better in Europe and Asia
- US is not economically better for putting Satelle in space, the economy is also one of the indicator of technology.
- In car, Europeans are better

However US $ muscle and can do things such as:

- To keep superiority in air over SU MKI-30 (around $45 million), F-22 (around $200 million) can be mass manufactured
- Deep space exploration, sending probes
- Space shuttles for space research
- NTSC was inferior to PAL and SECAM, can take a leap into HDTV

---

face makeup characteristic

Ann Ruben

07-05 09:02 PM

It is certainly possible to continue the green card process in your situation. The key requirement is that once your PD becomes current you MUST have a full time permanent job offer in the US, which you intend to accept.

If you abandon your I-485 and pursue consular processing, that position MUST be in the same position and with the same employer that obtained your labor certification. AC-21 DOES NOT APPLY TO CONSULAR PROCESSING. If you maintain either your A/P validity or H-1 visa validity, as long as the position is in the "same or similar occupation", it can be with any US employer.

Keep in mind that even if your family ends up abandoning their I-485's, as long as you do not abandon your I-485 they will be able to "follow to join" you once your AOS is granted.

Also keep in mind the possibility of EB-1 eligibility if your position with the new company can be characterized as managerial or executive and you are able to secure a transfer back to the US in a managerial or executive position after working in India for at least one year.

I hope this information is helpful,

Ann

---

more...

Geisha face paint

Queen Josephine

August 9th, 2005, 07:42 AM

I am trained as a physicist, and crossed polarizers are a common method of managing light in physics experiments, so I decided to try that here.

You can't use circular polarizers like most of us have for our autofocus DSLRs. Stacked C-polarizers don't black out, because they are both filtering the same light.

With two polarizers you get weird rainbow effects from diffraction, and the whole scene tends to the purple/UV.

Always nice to have a scientist on board seeing possibilities we sometimes miss. Thanks for the great explanation Michael!

---

2010 MrS - Geisha amp; Maiko make-up

She paints her face to hide

snathan

02-17 09:14 PM

Thanks a lot snathan.

emploer A is still holding my H1b, they did not revoke it.

employer A(American Company) has offered me a job and asked me to start from Monday(02/23) but employer B(Indian Company) has applied for
H1b transfer.

The only thing I am worried, if there is another layoff with employer A before H1B transfer with employer B. In that situation can I join employer B and maintain my status.

please help me.

Yes...if you get the approval, you can join the company B, anytime you want.

---

more...

a Japanese geisha, make-up

vasu009

07-11 03:34 PM

Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), chair of the House Immigration Subcommittee, sent Secretary Chertoff a list of questions and a request for documents from USCIS to get to the bottom of the whole Visa Bulletin fiasco. The letter is very interesting not just because it puts a heck of a lot of pressure on DHS right now, but also because Lofgren's folks imply from the questions that USCIS was short circuiting established security clearance procedures to "pre-request" visa numbers from DOS. If it turns out full security clearances were not carried out, USCIS will either need to say that they had the legal justification (which would be a public relations disaster for the agency) or that they intended to complete the checks after the fact (which would be a direct violation of their own regulations). The only way to avoid answering the questions and to make this go away would be to eat crow and start working the case July cases.

http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/

Download letter_to_chertoff_re_visa_bulletin_issues_july_9_ 2007.pdf

---

hair Everyone bow down to Geisha

The oil lifts the makeup of

wandmaker

07-23 07:44 AM

All,

I feel that those who concurrently filed I-140/485 in July 2007 are very lucky!

Here is my situation -

Previous Employer -
EB3,PD-Jan'04,I-140 cleared. Switched in June 2007 and wasn't able to file I-485 in July 2007

New Employer -
EB2, PD-Dec'-07, I-140 (Feb'08 - pending)

Question -

Based on Jun'08 Visa bulletin the dates for EB2-India were at Apr'04. Filed for I-140/485 based on my old priority date for EB3 labor (Jan'04). Explaining USCIS for PD transfer.

Well, folks at NSC did not understand the PD transfer concept and send my application back. Unclear as to what do now. I guess need to wait until the dates for EB2-India reach Dec'07 such that I can file.

Any "Creative" thoughts on how to approach USCIS moving forward.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Aamchimumbai

(1) you first will have to apply for 140 with porting request until it is approved the PD is not yours (2) apply for 485, if the PD is current. NSC folks did the right by returning your application because concurrent filing is not possible, if the 140 has porting request.

---

more...

Looks, cosplay makeup, you

ras

04-03 01:16 AM

The letter is dated as
Date: Jan 8, 2008

and it mentions at the end

'You must submit the requested information within tweleve(12) weeks from the date of this letter. Failure to do so may result in the denial of your petition.'

so if we count 12 weeks from Jan 8, it is going to be 84 days which is going to finish by April 2nd.

If the RFE response reaches by say this Monday i.e Apr 7th will it be OK?

The reasons for delay are financial adjustments.

He is now going to send the tax returns for 2007 which has been asked.

---

hot The face is the only thing I

facequot; makeup of geisha and

uma001

07-24 03:41 PM

More details are needed to answer this question better.

I think that any time is a good time - it is better to start the process early. If the company is paying for the process - what is the harm. He should go ahead... If he is planning to leave the company and is required to sign some type of agreement to start GC process - then it will be a different story.


Well, If they file it now, they get queries like ' Why do you need this guy when there are so many americans looking for job. Need detailed documentation and business necessities to sponsor green card for this person'...this happened to three of my friends recently.

Finally it is up to you whether you want to go ahead now or later.

---

more...


house Face Makeup; Many people think

Melody Thornton face makeup

kaskar

06-19 01:27 PM

any members planning consular processing in delhi ???
please respond

---

tattoo face makeup characteristic

Glitter Face Makeup

GCwaitforever

05-31 02:45 PM

Thanks for sharing your experiences. I am also sponsoring my mother-in-law to come here. I will have to see how this goes.

---

more...


pictures Geisha face paint

painted with face paint

kirupa

10-11 04:25 AM

Thanks - fixed! :)

---

dresses facequot; makeup of geisha and

Geisha (芸者), Geiko (芸子) or

breddy2000

12-16 12:22 PM

A freind of mine had two years EAD and don't have H1 anymore. His drivers License was denied as EAD is not considered a valid document for drivers License extention.
This happened in Wayne , NJ.
I too will be going for the renewal soon. Did anyone else faced similar situtation. If yes, how did they resolve?

It quiet common that each office follows different rules.

No harm in trying at different offices. As someone suggested take the printout of the valid identification cards and you should be all set.

---

more...


makeup a Japanese geisha, make-up

Face Makeup; Many people think

Sunx_2004

10-17 07:16 PM

July 17th no receipt yet

Just chill
;)

My application was filed on 19th July .However I have not received my receipts yet. Has your friend contacted the USCIS and inquired since 90 days are over?

Thanks,

Kapil

---

girlfriend Glitter Face Makeup

modern geisha

thomachan72

01-13 05:20 AM

Totally agree with the above post. I know many folks who were in your position but did not have to leave. Some found new jobs within a months time others took a bit longer. Your 140 revokation or H1b withdrawal will not be an issue since you move onto EAD or you should transfer your H1b soon. Best.

---

hairstyles Looks, cosplay makeup, you

Perfect over thethis makeup cant believe the secondtraditional not so

sajimm

08-16 11:21 PM

Me and my wife took the chest X-ray and didn�t take the TB skin test. Doctor has checked the �not taken� check box for the skin test and �negative� under the X-ray section in the medical report.

Wondering this is going to get us in trouble

Anyone else in the same situation?

PD 2003 April EB3
485 applied - June 27th, Receipt and FP notice received.

---

vgc

07-26 10:37 AM

SA 2428. Mr. CORNYN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2638, making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:


At the appropriate place, insert the following:

SEC. __. EMPLOYMENT-BASED VISAS.

(a) Recapture of Unused Employment-Based Immigrant Visas.--Section 106(d) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-313; 8 U.S.C. 1153 note) is amended--

(1) in paragraph (1)--

(A) by inserting ``1994, 1996, 1997, 1998,'' after ``available in fiscal year'';

(B) by striking ``or 2004'' and inserting ``2004, or 2006''; and

(C) by striking ``be available'' and all that follows and inserting the following: ``be available only to--

``(A) employment-based immigrants under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b));

``(B) the family members accompanying or following to join such employment-based immigrants under section 203(d) of such Act; and

``(C) those immigrant workers who had petitions approved based on Schedule A, Group I under section 656.5 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, as promulgated by the Secretary of Labor.''; and

(2) in paragraph (2)--

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``1999 through 2004'' and inserting ``1994, 1996 through 1998, 2001 through 2004, and 2006''; and

(B) in subparagraph (B), by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:

``(ii) DISTRIBUTION OF VISAS.--The total number of visas made available under paragraph (1) from unused visas from fiscal years 1994, 1996 through 1998, 2001 through 2004, and 2006 shall be distributed as follows:

``(I) The total number of visas made available for immigrant workers who had petitions approved based on Schedule A, Group I under section 656.5 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, as promulgated by the Secretary of Labor shall be 61,000.

``(II) The visas remaining from the total made available under subclause (I) shall be allocated to employment-based immigrants with approved petitions under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (and their family members accompanying or following to join).''.

(b) H-1B Visa Availability.--Section 214(g)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)(A)) is amended--

(1) in clause (vi), by striking ``and'' at the end;

(2) by redesignating clause (vii) as clause (ix); and

(3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following:

[Page: S9966] GPO's PDF ``(vii) 65,000 in each of fiscal years 2004 through 2007;

``(viii) 115,000 in fiscal year 2008; and''.

---

injrav

03-25 01:51 PM

gap between your company A exit date and the date they withdrew your I140?
As per law,, they should not do it for 6 months old approved I140 ?

---