Hellhammer
May 5, 01:12 AM
I don't get it either. You can buy Lion when it comes and install it. Yes, it will cost you a bit more but are you sure that you want to wait several months for it? There is also the fact that the first couple of versions will have lots of bugs.
Apple OC
Apr 20, 07:47 PM
Darn ... I never took my empties back to the Beer Store. :cool:
jayducharme
Aug 1, 06:54 PM
It's still beats the pants off anything windows...we're just used to everything working so well it's easy to critique.
That's really my point. Apple has set the bar high for itself. If I bought a Windows CE phone, I'd expect to have problems. But few Apple products in the last decade have had so many highly publicized issues as iPhone 4. Notice there isn't much press about iPhone 3GS issues or iPad issues or Mac Mini issues. Apple usually produces produces with great usability and high reliability. Maybe I've just gotten spoiled over the years....
That's really my point. Apple has set the bar high for itself. If I bought a Windows CE phone, I'd expect to have problems. But few Apple products in the last decade have had so many highly publicized issues as iPhone 4. Notice there isn't much press about iPhone 3GS issues or iPad issues or Mac Mini issues. Apple usually produces produces with great usability and high reliability. Maybe I've just gotten spoiled over the years....
hitekalex
Apr 6, 04:57 PM
Yes, but you are limited to very low powered devices, I believe it is 10 ma or less, in effect only the SD adaptor works, to use the USB adapter you must add a self powered hub.....
Does iPhone need to be jailbroken to support SD Adapter? I was under impression Camera Connection kit only worked with iPad (power issues aside)?
Have you actually used SD Adapter with an iPhone?
Does iPhone need to be jailbroken to support SD Adapter? I was under impression Camera Connection kit only worked with iPad (power issues aside)?
Have you actually used SD Adapter with an iPhone?
more...
Surrylic
May 1, 07:25 AM
off hand i'm going to say, what's the point of getting a white iphone if you're going to put a case on it?
all though, a black bumper on a white phone looks pretty cool.
Image (http://www.gadgetsnews.co.uk/images/bumper%20black.jpg)
Well even if you use a full body case you're still going to be seeing the white front. Cases never really hide the front of the phone, which is the only part you're looking at anyway.
Back when the iP4 was first released last year and we all thought it would be a short wait for the white version (or initially that it would be on time) I was a huge fan of the bright orange bumper. I went ahead and bought the black one last July or whatever, so now I'm going to buy a white back plate to put on... but I'm leaving mine naked. I like the style of the phone way too much to put a case on now that I've had it this long and am no longer like ZOMG DO NOT TOUCH PHONE! Must keep mint condition!
all though, a black bumper on a white phone looks pretty cool.
Image (http://www.gadgetsnews.co.uk/images/bumper%20black.jpg)
Well even if you use a full body case you're still going to be seeing the white front. Cases never really hide the front of the phone, which is the only part you're looking at anyway.
Back when the iP4 was first released last year and we all thought it would be a short wait for the white version (or initially that it would be on time) I was a huge fan of the bright orange bumper. I went ahead and bought the black one last July or whatever, so now I'm going to buy a white back plate to put on... but I'm leaving mine naked. I like the style of the phone way too much to put a case on now that I've had it this long and am no longer like ZOMG DO NOT TOUCH PHONE! Must keep mint condition!
alust2013
Apr 3, 03:15 PM
-drools- Sorry, that does look pretty sweet.
more...
Ceebee1980
May 6, 07:50 PM
What were the airport issues you were having? At home, my wireless seems a bit quicker to load pages, but at Borders, I notice that my computer finds the wireless connection way faster and connects equally fast.
teflon
Apr 20, 05:12 PM
I'm a first time renter, looking for an apartment/studio in Manhattan. I was hoping to not have to go through brokers and such and just use listings online. But now the more I look, the more I'm afraid I'm going to get scammed, even though rental scams seems to be relatively rare.
So there's this one listing, where the contact number for the person is a landline in Seattle. The listing is even a "featured listing" on the website. Another one's phone number is a landline in Syracuse. Is it possible that these people (I suppose they could be startup real estate agents) are doing business while they're not here? And what happens if I actually call? Also, there's a listing that has the phone number of a design company in New York.
Then there's this landlord/agent I've been corresponding to via email. This apartment has been listed at numerous rental websites (the free kind). And the person only has one listing. Which makes sense, since she says she owns the unit. Except she puts herself as part of a realty company, whose name starts with her last name.
The price is quite low for the area, but she did email me a rental application form. And at least her number is in New York.
She offers a discount if you pay 3 months upfront, more if you pay even more upfront. I was thinking of paying 3 month upfront, but I'm afraid that she's going to bail and disappear. Plus I'm not moving in until about 4 months later, so there's plenty of empty time in between that she can disappear on me.
So exactly what should I ask/do to make sure the listing/landlords are legit? And since I'm not moving in for months, should I wait until what, a week before moving in to pay them the security and rent?
So there's this one listing, where the contact number for the person is a landline in Seattle. The listing is even a "featured listing" on the website. Another one's phone number is a landline in Syracuse. Is it possible that these people (I suppose they could be startup real estate agents) are doing business while they're not here? And what happens if I actually call? Also, there's a listing that has the phone number of a design company in New York.
Then there's this landlord/agent I've been corresponding to via email. This apartment has been listed at numerous rental websites (the free kind). And the person only has one listing. Which makes sense, since she says she owns the unit. Except she puts herself as part of a realty company, whose name starts with her last name.
The price is quite low for the area, but she did email me a rental application form. And at least her number is in New York.
She offers a discount if you pay 3 months upfront, more if you pay even more upfront. I was thinking of paying 3 month upfront, but I'm afraid that she's going to bail and disappear. Plus I'm not moving in until about 4 months later, so there's plenty of empty time in between that she can disappear on me.
So exactly what should I ask/do to make sure the listing/landlords are legit? And since I'm not moving in for months, should I wait until what, a week before moving in to pay them the security and rent?
more...
AppledUp
Apr 29, 10:36 PM
Thanks for more suggestions the mStand looks the best and ive heard nothing but good things
Nermal
Jul 4, 10:28 PM
Just for a quick check, I've got 10.2.6 and have the following Dock and Finder files in my /System/Library/CoreServices:
Finder, 368 bytes, version "Mac OS X Fake Finder 10.0", date 14/7/02, 11:34 PM.
Finder.app, 10 560 787 bytes, version "Mac OS X Finder 10.2.1", date 22/10/02, 11:35 AM.
Dock.app, 585 510 bytes, version "Dock 1.1.1", date 22/10/02, 11:25 AM.
I installed from the 10.2.1 CDs and updated to 10.2.6. Take a look at your files and see if they're the same size and version.
Edit: Just looked at the permissions, all 3 files are set to:
Owner: system
Access: Read & Write
Group: wheel
Access: Read only
Others: Read only
Finder, 368 bytes, version "Mac OS X Fake Finder 10.0", date 14/7/02, 11:34 PM.
Finder.app, 10 560 787 bytes, version "Mac OS X Finder 10.2.1", date 22/10/02, 11:35 AM.
Dock.app, 585 510 bytes, version "Dock 1.1.1", date 22/10/02, 11:25 AM.
I installed from the 10.2.1 CDs and updated to 10.2.6. Take a look at your files and see if they're the same size and version.
Edit: Just looked at the permissions, all 3 files are set to:
Owner: system
Access: Read & Write
Group: wheel
Access: Read only
Others: Read only
more...
zeemeerman2
Mar 11, 11:11 AM
Just curious.
- Internal HDD/SSD. By overwriting my previous OS (can be clean install or upgrade). (e.g. Snow Leopard)
- Internal HDD/SSD. By making a new partition and installing it there.
- External HDD/SSD. Erased HDD and just installed it.
- External HDD/SSD. Repartitioned to not lose any data and installed on a new partition.
- USB-stick/SD-card.
- Internal HDD/SSD. By overwriting my previous OS (can be clean install or upgrade). (e.g. Snow Leopard)
- Internal HDD/SSD. By making a new partition and installing it there.
- External HDD/SSD. Erased HDD and just installed it.
- External HDD/SSD. Repartitioned to not lose any data and installed on a new partition.
- USB-stick/SD-card.
twoodcc
Oct 21, 08:44 AM
I wonder if cuda would run on the 9400? graphics chip? that would help get some extra ppd. Too bad you can't change graphics boards in that monster iMac, it seems like it could use faster graphics for that large monitor.
yeah i know. a better video card option would be nice
I've been doing nothing but GPU folding even with a Q6600 or Core i5 750. :(
what card do you have?
I predict 45 mins per frame, 15k PPD.
but wouldn't 45 min a frame take about 3.125 days to complete, plus the upload time, so about 3.15 days? wouldn't you still get a bonus for that?
yeah i know. a better video card option would be nice
I've been doing nothing but GPU folding even with a Q6600 or Core i5 750. :(
what card do you have?
I predict 45 mins per frame, 15k PPD.
but wouldn't 45 min a frame take about 3.125 days to complete, plus the upload time, so about 3.15 days? wouldn't you still get a bonus for that?
more...
SmilesLots
Apr 14, 04:11 PM
Seems that Safari or network is about 10% what it used to be in speed. I recently add the MacUpdate Spring Promo package, and seems some of the programs are POC. Not sure if this is part of the problem because the slowdown happened beore that install I think.
OK. Used Tech Tool Pro. All smart status checks ok. All 6 disks check ok. So not a disk problem since it happens on all disks.
OK. Used Tech Tool Pro. All smart status checks ok. All 6 disks check ok. So not a disk problem since it happens on all disks.
philipt42
Nov 2, 08:17 PM
Come on, one of the top threads on the music forum is "what are you listening to pt 2"!
:confused:
:confused:
more...
ipacmm
Dec 14, 04:59 PM
I have a 6gb green mini that i could sell.
Dave H
May 1, 07:45 PM
There are also G4 optimized builds of Camino here (http://www.rpm-mozilla.org.uk/index.html). A 1.33GHz G4 iBook would use the "7450" build.
more...
e�Studios
Mar 21, 08:17 PM
Both...I play with friends and myself.
Oh the innuendo... ;)
Oh the innuendo... ;)
Littleodie914
Mar 17, 06:19 PM
yeah something doesn't sound right here. can you tell us exactly what flags you used when starting folding?
are you using the console client?Sure, I'm running a shortcut of the SMP version:
.../FAH6.34-win32-SMP.exe -smp -bigadv
FahMon apparently pulled itself together, and is now reporting a more reasonable 8955 points for this protein. The deadline is still the same though.
Here's my console output:
[01:06:40] + Downloading new core: FahCore_a5.exe
[01:06:41] + 10240 bytes downloaded
...yadda yadda...
[01:06:49] + 2711739 bytes downloaded
[01:06:49] Verifying core Core_a5.fah...
[01:06:49] Signature is VALID
[01:06:49]
[01:06:49] Trying to unzip core FahCore_a5.exe
[01:06:50] Decompressed FahCore_a5.exe (9326080 bytes) successfully
[01:06:55] + Core successfully engaged
[01:07:00]
[01:07:00] + Processing work unit
[01:07:00] Core required: FahCore_a5.exe
[01:07:00] Core found.
[01:07:00] Working on queue slot 01 [March 18 01:07:00 UTC]
[01:07:00] + Working ...
[01:07:00]
[01:07:00] *------------------------------*
[01:07:00] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[01:07:00] Version 2.27 (Mar 12, 2010)
[01:07:00]
[01:07:00] Preparing to commence simulation
[01:07:00] - Looking at optimizations...
[01:07:00] - Created dyn
[01:07:00] - Files status OK
[01:07:06] - Expanded 24864068 -> 30796292 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[01:07:06] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24864068 data_size=3
0796292, decompressed_data_size=30796292 diff=0
[01:07:06] - Digital signature verified
[01:07:06]
[01:07:06] Project: 6901 (Run 21, Clone 10, Gen 6)
[01:07:06]
[01:07:07] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[01:07:07] Entering M.D.
[01:07:13] Mapping NT from 8 to 8
[01:07:17] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[02:22:51] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
are you using the console client?Sure, I'm running a shortcut of the SMP version:
.../FAH6.34-win32-SMP.exe -smp -bigadv
FahMon apparently pulled itself together, and is now reporting a more reasonable 8955 points for this protein. The deadline is still the same though.
Here's my console output:
[01:06:40] + Downloading new core: FahCore_a5.exe
[01:06:41] + 10240 bytes downloaded
...yadda yadda...
[01:06:49] + 2711739 bytes downloaded
[01:06:49] Verifying core Core_a5.fah...
[01:06:49] Signature is VALID
[01:06:49]
[01:06:49] Trying to unzip core FahCore_a5.exe
[01:06:50] Decompressed FahCore_a5.exe (9326080 bytes) successfully
[01:06:55] + Core successfully engaged
[01:07:00]
[01:07:00] + Processing work unit
[01:07:00] Core required: FahCore_a5.exe
[01:07:00] Core found.
[01:07:00] Working on queue slot 01 [March 18 01:07:00 UTC]
[01:07:00] + Working ...
[01:07:00]
[01:07:00] *------------------------------*
[01:07:00] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[01:07:00] Version 2.27 (Mar 12, 2010)
[01:07:00]
[01:07:00] Preparing to commence simulation
[01:07:00] - Looking at optimizations...
[01:07:00] - Created dyn
[01:07:00] - Files status OK
[01:07:06] - Expanded 24864068 -> 30796292 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[01:07:06] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24864068 data_size=3
0796292, decompressed_data_size=30796292 diff=0
[01:07:06] - Digital signature verified
[01:07:06]
[01:07:06] Project: 6901 (Run 21, Clone 10, Gen 6)
[01:07:06]
[01:07:07] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[01:07:07] Entering M.D.
[01:07:13] Mapping NT from 8 to 8
[01:07:17] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[02:22:51] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
Dwalls90
Apr 13, 02:34 PM
Like I said, unfortunately it may not be isolated to DP2 ... which is more annoying since that means it's probably an iTunes/iOS bug :(
twoodcc
Nov 20, 04:19 PM
okay, so i get an error from folding on my mac pro. looking at the log file, it gets done folding, or at 99%, and then it gets an error, and quits that work unit and downloads another unit, and starts with that one.
anyone ever run into this before?
also, i have 2 different Leopard installations on 2 different hard drives in the mac. would this possibly mess something up?
anyone ever run into this before?
also, i have 2 different Leopard installations on 2 different hard drives in the mac. would this possibly mess something up?
FireSokar
Mar 19, 06:58 PM
Simple, play dumb. Claim it was there when you got it.
mcdj
Apr 24, 12:30 AM
They CANNOT be compared. Two totally different IEM's. Two totally different prices.
Exactly. I was pointing out that Ajays Four are nowhere near high end, by comparing them to something high end.
Exactly. I was pointing out that Ajays Four are nowhere near high end, by comparing them to something high end.
tekkierich
Feb 18, 12:55 PM
I like the iFixit guide
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-Mac-mini-Model-A1347-Hard-Drive-Replacement/3113/1 (http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-Mac-mini-Model-A1347-Hard-Drive-Replacement/3113/1)
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-Mac-mini-Model-A1347-Hard-Drive-Replacement/3113/1 (http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-Mac-mini-Model-A1347-Hard-Drive-Replacement/3113/1)
solientblack
Apr 26, 09:15 AM
Quick update. I've made some more progress. I thought I had not been able to get the phone into DFU mode. I tried it a few more times (the steps of how to get it into DFU mode) and finally its restoring. My phone is staying on with the Plug into iTunes screen. will update once it is done restoring and installing the firmware.
edit: blevins just to be safe I took the sim out and made sure it was seated properly. thank you for the reply
edit2: it says the iPhone "iPhone" could not be restored. An unkown error occurred (1604)
edit: blevins just to be safe I took the sim out and made sure it was seated properly. thank you for the reply
edit2: it says the iPhone "iPhone" could not be restored. An unkown error occurred (1604)
No comments:
Post a Comment